AuthorTopic: reverse dislocation system.....oh no not again!  (Read 757 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

colintandy

  • Guest
reverse dislocation system.....oh no not again!
« on: January 04, 2006, 19:57:14 »
:D been looking at different suspension set ups going on and came across gone to fars revese dislocatoin system ! question is this has anyone got this on there trucks and using what are the difference in using are they better than dislocation cones up top or is the relocation system better !  :D as im going to be changing to dislocation or reverse dislocation or is this system only good for 3 link system or can it be used on disco also any one no about this or using this system on there truck regards colin  remember wheels on ground stability and traction! :D

Offline rollazuki

  • Posts: 869
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
reverse dislocation system.....oh no not again!
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2006, 20:48:21 »
Personally I cant see it making much difference, the weight of the spring is very much outclassed by the weight of the axle.
The zook initially had dislocator pyramids at the axle end, but now runs em on the chassis, and Ive noticed no difference.
I suppose the chassis end means less hardware mounted on the axle which may give a (very) slightly better ride on road(reduces unsprung weight and all that)
Go on....cut me in half........it says SUZUKI all the way thru the middle!!



Offline Wanderer

  • Posts: 4846
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
reverse dislocation system.....oh no not again!
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2006, 20:53:38 »
Oh dear........

To the n'th degree the weight of the springs should make a difference (extremely minimal I agree but ) to the traction gained by the hanging axle.
Ed
1993 200tdi Snorkly

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal