AuthorTopic: Apple vs LandRover  (Read 635 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline datalas

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2727
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Apple vs LandRover
« on: August 19, 2006, 10:12:15 »
Since Apple are currently suing anyone who uses the word "pod" irrespective of whether they use it in the context of the iPod[1],  is LandRover's use of the "TerraPod" up for dispute :?

Are the pod people in trouble?   Are the police themselves going to have to be insanely carefull about guarding the differentiating L ?



[1] Thats the Apple iPod (c)(tm)(r)(love) to give it it's full name so Apple (tm)(r)(c)(swoon) don't try and sue me ...
--


Offline ian_s

  • Posts: 969
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Apple vs LandRover
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2006, 10:34:25 »
so are they going to start sueing pea farmers?
series 3 - 200tdi
Discovery V8

Offline scorpio

  • Posts: 177
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Apple vs LandRover
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2006, 12:46:06 »
Quote from: "ian_s"
so are they going to start sueing pea farmers?


No but they are going to sue greengrocers for selling Peas in the POD  :lol:  :lol:
Peter
Drive British drive Land Rover
Discovery 300 TDI
Discovery 3 TDV6s

Offline MK1

  • Posts: 111
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Apple vs LandRover
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2006, 15:21:09 »
That sounds cobblers to me. What about Pod shoes from the 80s?

Offline clbarclay

  • Posts: 1615
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Apple vs LandRover
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2006, 17:47:02 »
He reaches for the CD player (mp3 bah humbug) and sticks on Eagles - Get over it.


Ahhh thats better.
Chris

Various range rovers from 1986 to 1988 in various states
Locost sports car based on mk2 escort - currently working on brakes, fuel and wiring

Offline Rangie3.0LtrDan

  • Posts: 906
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Apple vs LandRover
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2006, 18:01:59 »
Thats a bit of a contradiction there Clbarclay in that you are not modern enough for an mp3 player yet you pick one of the most modern songs from an old band to describe this metaphorically!
The difference between genius and stupidity is; genius has its limits.

1982 Range Rover 3.0Ltr Turbo Diesel - Redun



Offline clbarclay

  • Posts: 1615
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Apple vs LandRover
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2006, 20:48:02 »
Quote from: "Rangie3.0LtrDan"
Thats a bit of a contradiction there Clbarclay in that you are not modern enough for an mp3 player yet you pick one of the most modern songs from an old band to describe this metaphorically!



You may have miss understood the bah humbug, it was due to ipod being the names most associated with mp3.

As for me, I use mp3 as much as CDs, its just a question of time and place.
Chris

Various range rovers from 1986 to 1988 in various states
Locost sports car based on mk2 escort - currently working on brakes, fuel and wiring

Offline thermidorthelobster

  • Posts: 3557
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Apple vs LandRover
« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2006, 11:07:42 »
In the version I'd heard, Apple aren't sueing anybody.  They've written some Cease and Desist letters to people using the word Pod in products specifically related to iPods and MP3 players, which is hardly news.  Who are they sueing actually?
David French
Tree-hugging communist
1999 Discovery II TD5 Manual
Patriot roof rack, QT Services diff guards front & rear, DiscoParts steering guard[/url], Autologic ECU upgrade, 2" Old Man Emu lift, 235/85R16 BF Goodrich All Terrains, Safari snorkel, DiscoParts jackable sills, Warn Tabor 9000

Ex Disco 200TDI, P38a 4.6HSE and 101FC 6x6 Camper.  Africa Trip Blog

Offline datalas

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2727
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Apple vs LandRover
« Reply #8 on: August 21, 2006, 17:20:28 »
the definition of "related to iPod" is I beleive a shade on the open to interpretation side,  I wasn't deliberately trying to have a go at the wonder that is apple (as they can clearly do no wrong, aren't they marvelous etc) but merely wanting to have a bit of a joke about it all ...

"Profit Pod is a device that compiles data from vending machines" which recieved a cease and desist.. now, I didn't actually know that a vending machine was related to an iPod, but what do I know ?
--


 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal