Forum back online. Please post!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
"They can have my 4x4 when they prise it from my cold, dead hand!" :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: "Skibum346""They can have my 4x4 when they prise it from my cold, dead hand!" :lol: :lol: :lol:But you'll have died from asphyxiation because of it being four wheel drive of course.
I was out with the dogs around 10.30 Saturday night. Clear sky and full of stars. At one point I counted 9, yes 9, aircraft flying over head. None military, all civil.
Now I'm not a plane spotter!
Well Concorde burns a tonne of fuel per seat, about 3 times the amount a 747 burns on a similar flight, so about 360kg of fuel per seat per flight and most of that goes dring take off, Concorde burns over a tonne getting down the runway, don't know about the 747.So a family of 4 going on their holidays, that's 8 seats worth (2 flights) or about 2,900kg of fuel for a week in the sun.That's near £3,000 for us motorists.
Well Concorde burns a tonne of fuel per seat
Quote from: "Range Rover Blues"Well Concorde burns a tonne of fuel per seat, about 3 times the amount a 747 burns on a similar flight, so about 360kg of fuel per seat per flight and most of that goes dring take off, Concorde burns over a tonne getting down the runway, don't know about the 747.So a family of 4 going on their holidays, that's 8 seats worth (2 flights) or about 2,900kg of fuel for a week in the sun.That's near £3,000 for us motorists.You've forgotten to add in the difference in seats 747 has more seat than a concorde therefore cost is a lot cheaper than you state
The only reason you don't notice is the lack of TAX on avaition fuel.