AuthorTopic: Third Party claim against Bunnie - Have a Laff!  (Read 688 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Evilgoat

  • Posts: 2786
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Third Party claim against Bunnie - Have a Laff!
« on: November 14, 2006, 09:47:29 »
Okie I like this one.

Those of you that have seen the zook in action will vouch for just how
much it takes to stop her, in particular Fingers will remeber the moments
of 'Are you sure thats not a deisel?' from a few weeks back.

She's got a 1" lift, all terrain tires, more waterproofing on the ignition
system that I beleived was possible and a snorkel. She has on more than
one ocasion been into a river up to her wingmirrors. Been thrown through
fords without missing a beat and generally been exposed to amounts of
water that might even scare some deisel owners.
.

.

Third party claim: That while stationary Bunnie swerved to avoid a puddle
and he backended her as a result.

I'll leave you to work out how many ways his version is wrong. and if
anything, Bunnie AIMS for puddles and doesnt avoid them.
I must confess the the activities of the UK governments for the past couple of years have been watched with frank admiration and amazement by Lord Vetinari. Outright theft as a policy had never occured to him.

-- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)

EX HK Police Mitsubishi Pajero 2.8TD
Audi S2 Avant 360bhp
Transit LWB 2.5di (The Shed)


Offline Boggert

  • Posts: 1408
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Third Party claim against Bunnie - Have a Laff!
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2006, 11:08:56 »
Even if that piece of fiction was true, he is still at fault for driving too close, he should have left enough room!

I would heve also pointed out Bunnie like Mud and Puddles!  :lol:

Keep fighting your corner.
If want to walk it walk it, if you want to ride it ride it just leave me alone to drive it!

"Save The Cheer leader, save the world"

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15221
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Third Party claim against Bunnie - Have a Laff!
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2006, 11:26:27 »
Then simplky pointout that if the water were deep enough to worry Bunnie, the following car would have stopped dead because of the bow-wave it would create.

Following too close to see an obsticle in front of the car you are following, hmm.

And he hit you because you swerved?

How exactly does this happen, the numpty.

Oh, I should point out that to splash pedestians (other motorists come to that) uneccesarily or deliberatley is an offence, so if you did swerve you were obeying the law :wink:
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

Offline Priglet

  • Posts: 186
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Third Party claim against Bunnie - Have a Laff!
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2006, 13:09:34 »
Quote from: "Evilgoat"


Third party claim: That while stationary Bunnie swerved to avoid a puddle
and he backended her as a result.



I'm intrigued  according to dictionary.com  swerve is 1. to turn aside abruptly in movement or direction; deviate suddenly from the straight or direct course.  

How can you do that if you're stationary, or if the third party was stationary how  does it matter what Bunnie did as they weren't moving, next they'll claim Bunnie reversed into them to avoid the puddle.
Phil

Daisy the 110SW, a greenhouse on wheels.

Offline burgerman

  • Posts: 1027
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 1
Third Party claim against Bunnie - Have a Laff!
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2006, 13:34:13 »
There was recently a hearing in court, sadly about a fatality on the railway, but did make you wonder  when the judge asked the driver involved if he could of swerved to avoid the incident"   ](*,)


    Kinda makes ya wonder sometimes :roll:
TD5 with a few Tweaks ;o)
a bit more fuel friendly than the V8

Offline Damonski

  • Posts: 1081
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Cheshire :)
  • Referrals: 0
Third Party claim against Bunnie - Have a Laff!
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2006, 19:30:14 »
Did you dip the puddle with your famous trusty measuring stick ?  :lol:
--

Damian

Range Rover Classic 2.4TD  | Disco 300 Mpi | Citroen Xantia Activa
plus other rainy day projects....

Facebook Me

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15221
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Third Party claim against Bunnie - Have a Laff!
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2006, 02:08:52 »
Quote from: "burgerman"
There was recently a hearing in court, sadly about a fatality on the railway, but did make you wonder  when the judge asked the driver involved if he could of swerved to avoid the incident"   ](*,)


    Kinda makes ya wonder sometimes :roll:


Yes I've been warned today that judges are, well, a bit of a law unto themselves at times, kind of detached from reality.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal