Forum back online. Please post!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
the big question is, Is it legal? or it is agains human rights etc?
We may have a customer in NZ ..... so hopefully soon BYE BYE UK.
It's going to be a begger to enforce, and it's going to cost a fortune too, the question is (or perhaps should be) will the additional effort required to legislate, implement and enforce this offset the reduction in carbon (well, the theoretical reduction) that is gained ?Anyhow, considering that it is all relatively little amounts we're talking about here who really cares? Most of us I would think would rather avoid living in an inner city area, specifically one with on road parking.. oh look, another reason to not move to brighton :)
As I say these appear to be inner city residential parking passes ... so the questions are ...1) do the residential parking permits currently have vehicle specific data on them ? such as the registration of the vehicle in question. If so, how do you cope with people changing cars, or loaning the permit to someone who is staying at their house whilst they are on holiday.
2) furnished with #1, you'll have to employ some poor schmuck to trawl though the database of vehicles with the DVLA to ascertain CO2 emissions for each and every parking permit application.
3) alternative to #2 you could ask for this data on the application form, however this is rather open to abuse.
4) Are parking officers really going to be reading registration plates to see if they tie up with the one in the windscreen ?
Or, shall we go down the patented "darranoid" view of this, and the vehicle tracking charges ?The scheme will be investigated, at great cost to the tax payer with frequent tabloid headlines about the potential impact (financially) to the motorist. These costs will equate to say a 50% rise on what you effectively pay at present, some people will be better off, but the vast majority will be sufficiently narked to the tune of a shed load of cash.The scheme will then be abandoned as it has proven to be "too costly" to implement, or "technologically unachievable in the current climate", and therefor the institution responsible will completely back down on the potential 50% rise in fees, and instead suggest a much simpler policy of merely increasing road tax / fuel duty, which only costs your average punter say 15% more than they're paying now.Overjoyed at being spared a 50% price hike in favour of a 15% price hike, the population throws a spontaneous street party whilst the institution hands knighthoods and peerages to all involved and then randomly invades somewhere with the word "stan" in the name...