AuthorTopic: A good combo ??  (Read 4223 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 500bhp

  • Posts: 273
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« on: March 07, 2007, 18:08:58 »
I have been told of a 1991 Range Rover for sale fitted with a 1995 300 TDI engine gearbox and transfer case, would you think its a good combo, or will it be under powered, and any ideas of what I should look for with this sort of build....................Thanks

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2007, 18:15:15 »
My mate is selling one with a 200TDi, proffesional build and lots of paperwork (engine might be a gold-seal too) for £2k
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

Offline 500bhp

  • Posts: 273
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2007, 18:24:10 »
Not being a diesel guy up to now, whats the difference between a 200tdi and 300 tdi, any advantages over each?

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2007, 18:30:22 »
Each have their own fans, some people think the 200 is the stronger, some say the 300 is quieter.

I'ver only had 300TDI which I like, but I think either are a good engine.  I'm sure someone will be along who knows them better than me.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

Offline waveydavey

  • Posts: 757
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #4 on: March 07, 2007, 18:38:14 »
The biggest difference is control; the 200 is 100% mechanical from the pedal to the injection. The 300 starts bringing in electronics, it is smoother and a tad quieter but really the performance on both is much the same.

Tobe honest ona  conversion I would tend to prefer the 200 as it is more basic and hence less liable to complications.
P38 Range Rover (BMW !!!)
Off Road camping Trailer - SA Design
And a boat - if you can call QM2 a boat?

Offline 500bhp

  • Posts: 273
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #5 on: March 07, 2007, 21:31:19 »
So would a RR be underpowered with a 200tdi or 300tdi, compared to a 3.5 v8. I am assuming it weighs more than a Disco.

Offline Yoshi

  • Posts: 2215
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2007, 21:35:26 »
But wasnt the 300tdi only more electronic from about 1996 onwards with the third phase of the engine?

I have had both in discovery's but would definately prefer the 300tdi again, cos i loved it.

The 200tdi engine is fantastic also.

Just also to note there is a 300tdi rangie with mot on it for sale by me on an m plate for £1500


1995 Discovery XS 300TDi 4" lift and ready to go!

There is no devil, theres only god when he's drunk - Tom Waits.

Offline 500bhp

  • Posts: 273
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #7 on: March 07, 2007, 21:46:46 »
Is it a LHD?

Offline Yoshi

  • Posts: 2215
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #8 on: March 07, 2007, 21:56:19 »
no, standard rhd


1995 Discovery XS 300TDi 4" lift and ready to go!

There is no devil, theres only god when he's drunk - Tom Waits.

Offline 500bhp

  • Posts: 273
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2007, 22:02:00 »
No good for me here..........shame

Offline Yoshi

  • Posts: 2215
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2007, 22:24:14 »
Aye, if i had the money i would have it like a shot, cos its well underpriced.


1995 Discovery XS 300TDi 4" lift and ready to go!

There is no devil, theres only god when he's drunk - Tom Waits.

Offline waveydavey

  • Posts: 757
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #11 on: March 08, 2007, 06:57:23 »
If you are used to a V8 then either Diesel will feel a big sluggish but they are certainly not underpowered.
The first Disco was built on a Range Rover Chassis and Land Rover fittted both engines to Range Rovers so it is more than capable.

I think the 300 got more electronic as time went on. Really electronics are personal choice, they do a good job but the more you have the harder home maintinance is (without Rovercom).
P38 Range Rover (BMW !!!)
Off Road camping Trailer - SA Design
And a boat - if you can call QM2 a boat?

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
A good combo ??
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2007, 22:32:42 »
Quote from: "500bhp"
So would a RR be underpowered with a 200tdi or 300tdi, compared to a 3.5 v8. I am assuming it weighs more than a Disco.


You wouldn't think so if you saw Julie's :wink:

Yes the TDi is a little slower, RRR now has a TDi auto and It's definitely not as quick as her old V8 auto, but it's not embarasingly slow.  And it does about 30mpg :)
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal