AuthorTopic: Kumho's  (Read 527 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MuddyMachine

  • Posts: 610
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Kumho's
« on: April 08, 2007, 08:58:49 »
Baz
300Tdi Modded 90
H&B Response Call Sign HR039

http://muddymachine.googlepages.com/home

Offline muddysteve

  • Posts: 931
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Kumho's
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2007, 10:24:01 »
i run em on my 110 in 33x1250x15

31s are a bit tiny, not as tall as a 235.85 but a little bit fatter
Steve                www.lanerovers.co.uk    www.surreyoffroaders.co.uk

Offline MuddyMachine

  • Posts: 610
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Kumho's
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2007, 10:41:14 »
Didn't realize they where that small :oops:

Look like Ill be going for the 33's then :D
Baz
300Tdi Modded 90
H&B Response Call Sign HR039

http://muddymachine.googlepages.com/home

Offline muddymesser

  • Posts: 420
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Kumho's
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2007, 14:29:48 »
my dads got some of them there bloody good . . . th 31 10.5 15's are bout th same as 265 75 16's

cant w8 till he getssome bigger 1's so i can have th 31's
would a midget fall over doing the limbo???

Offline bullfrog

  • Posts: 1009
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Kumho's
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2007, 23:49:40 »
They are not that small. I know several people running 32"s on +2" lifted rangies and a shogy and they look and cope fine.
33"s are nice but unless they are going on the 90 then plan for arch mods and flares.
The older style Khumo is cheaper and works better though :wink:

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal