Can't argue with the horses mouth....
Nice it's that end talking for a change!
:lol:
Apparently you can try this link and this extract from their forum
http://www.vegetableoildiesel.co.uk/This exemption refers to Biofuels - which are Biodiesel, Bioblend, Bioethanol and Bioethanol blend.
The question would be does SVO/WVO qualify under the exemption.
1. If the SVO meets the fiscal definition for biodiesel (96.5% etsters and 0.005% or nil sulphur by weight etc..) then no problems.
2. If it does not meet the definition in No.1 above will it meet any of the other definitions?
2a. Is SVO a Bioblend = biodiesel mixed with heavy oil, therefore no.
2b & c. Is SVO a Bioethanol/blend = obviously not.
Therefore under the current HMC&E 197E (which has yet to be updated) SVO/WVO would be considered as a fuel substitute. Although a number of their other pages have not been updated they have been saying that SVO is a a fuel substitute:
From HMC&E FAQ page:
"What is the duty rate on cooking oil?
Cooking oil (whether used or unused) which has not been specifically produced or processed as a road fuel, will normally be classed as a fuel substitute. The duty rate will be the same as the sulphur-free diesel rate.
The important question is whether the finished fuel meets the legal definition. If a vegetable oil used as road fuel meets the fiscal definition HMRC will be happy to accept that it is entitled to the duty rate for biodiesel."
I fear, that unless, HMC&E or a stated case sheds light on the subject people using SVO as a biofuel should be prepared to show it meets the fiscal definition or be ready to pay the higher rate of duty.
I know that people will quote previous SVO rulings, but from memory the case rested on the fiscal definition.
Remember, all that has changed is the way the duty is collected. Unless I have missed it there has been no re-defining of the definitions of Biofuels.