AuthorTopic: rear shock mounts  (Read 1238 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lumbering Jack

  • Posts: 190
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
rear shock mounts
« on: October 14, 2007, 19:41:46 »
Having a bit of bother,  I've recently put a set of +2" springs all round on my 130 and I'm in a bit of a quandry over what to do shocks wise.

I do quite often carry a lot of weight and a few people have said that  many of the usual shocks might not be upto the abuse weight wise.

I've seen front turrets that can have two shocks fitted but up to now haven't seen rear ones that can be double shocked. Does anyone know if they exist?

Also has anyone had anything to do with the paddocks -2" rear shock mounts?  Feel this might end up being the way forward but on standar length heavy duty shocks.
R reg 3.9 Discovery on LPG - pretty standard at mo.

Offline L90OOK

  • Posts: 1252
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Somerset
  • Referrals: 0
rear shock mounts
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2007, 19:54:42 »
Personally I'd fit THESE or Old Man Emu Shocks with a pair of HD shock dropper plate.

Putting two shocks on could well over dampen the rear end, go with a new decent setup first.  If you are still not satisfied then fit a second shock.
Did everyone see that?  Because I will NOT be doing it again!

 

Guardian.

  • Guest
rear shock mounts
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2007, 19:55:09 »
our 110 had to have some sco.@an -2" rear shock mounts, we put a 2" lift on, and the rears were almot fully extended at rest due to the hd springs, so kept banging over bumps.

Offline zulublue

  • Posts: 756
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
rear shock mounts
« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2007, 20:07:43 »
IMO, I dont think the shocks will make a massive difference as they are there to dampen bumps and holes, to assist with pure weight I think the best way is to to fit stronger springs, OME etc.
You can compress a shocker by hand so it will not offer a great improvement on carried weight.

Look at your springs first there are different strength springs on offer, I.E if you have a HD Winch and Bumper.

Mark.

Offline Lumbering Jack

  • Posts: 190
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
rear shock mounts
« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2007, 20:11:47 »
Quote from: "Guardian."
our 110 had to have some sco.@an -2" rear shock mounts, we put a 2" lift on, and the rears were almot fully extended at rest due to the hd springs, so kept banging over bumps.


Have a feeling mine could be similar - had to jack rear axle up to meet the bottom of the shocks as they were at least 2" away even under it's own weight.  

Could it be worth going for longer shocks and lower mounts and then dislocators if needed?

Do like the idea of Britpart as they seem good value for money generally, not sure if can stretch to OME's yet though.
R reg 3.9 Discovery on LPG - pretty standard at mo.

Offline Lumbering Jack

  • Posts: 190
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
rear shock mounts
« Reply #5 on: October 14, 2007, 20:16:41 »
Quote from: "zulublue"
IMO, I dont think the shocks will make a massive difference as they are there to dampen bumps and holes, to assist with pure weight I think the best way is to to fit stronger springs, OME etc.
You can compress a shocker by hand so it will not offer a great improvement on carried weight.

Look at your springs first there are different strength springs on offer, I.E if you have a HD Winch and Bumper.

Mark.


Cheers Mark

I went for the Britpart +2" springs all round , not sure what weight fronts are but they are biggest they did.  The rears are 500kg and are monsters. Reckon with correct length shocks, the back could be sitting somewhere between 3 and 4 inches taller than standard.

can anyone recommend which shock mounts to go for?  Have only managed to find paddocks ones so far.
R reg 3.9 Discovery on LPG - pretty standard at mo.

Offline zulublue

  • Posts: 756
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
rear shock mounts
« Reply #6 on: October 14, 2007, 23:59:15 »
I am not a fan of the -2" shock mounts as it just compresses the shocker , ok you get the extra travel, but loose on the compression side of things.

I dont understand how you think the car is 3-4" lift when you state +2", have you put a body lift on also?

Guardian.

  • Guest
rear shock mounts
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2007, 02:18:20 »
THE 110 / 130 LIFT HIGHER ON THE REAR LIKE HE SAYS, DUE TO THE HEAVIER DUTY REAR SPRINGS, UNLIKE THE 90'S.
MY 110 HAS LIFTED A GOOD INCH OVER THE 2" (STATED)LIFT ON THE BACK, IM GONNA PUT SOME 20MM SPACERS IN THE FRONT TO LEVEL HER OUT, AS ITS NOT GOING TO BE CARRYING HEAVY LOADS THAT MUCH.

Offline L90OOK

  • Posts: 1252
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Somerset
  • Referrals: 0
rear shock mounts
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2007, 09:19:45 »
Quote from: "zulublue"
I am not a fan of the -2" shock mounts as it just compresses the shocker , ok you get the extra travel, but loose on the compression side of things.

I dont understand how you think the car is 3-4" lift when you state +2", have you put a body lift on also?


Don't forget it is a 2" lift over new ride height so it may look like a 3-4" lift when replacing old sagging springs :D

Shock droppers are brilliant.  They stop the shocks from extending to far & not working at all  :roll:
As for limiting the compression, I have larger tyres & extended bump stops so compression is limited by these factors not the shock  8)
Did everyone see that?  Because I will NOT be doing it again!

 

Offline Muddy

  • Posts: 257
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
rear shock mounts
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2007, 21:11:19 »
Shock droppers are quick fix and offer no more actual travel.

Yes they allow the axle to drop further but do not allow it to come up as far, you need both of 'droop' and 'bump' to get suspension that works well offroad.
if you you can make it i can break it.

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
rear shock mounts
« Reply #10 on: October 16, 2007, 01:17:08 »
You should be able to fit plus 2" shocks and still reach the bump stops safely, not sure if you can with dropped mounts.

I like ProComp though I find them a bit crashy when new.

Whether it's OME, Billies, DeCarbon or Procomp to name a few, they all work harder than the LR parts, worth it for towing.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

Offline Lumbering Jack

  • Posts: 190
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
rear shock mounts
« Reply #11 on: October 16, 2007, 07:25:20 »
Thanks for all your advice guys,

just need to get sorted and order bits now.  have just found out that britpart now do their cellular dynamic shocks in+2" so just waiting on price for comparison
R reg 3.9 Discovery on LPG - pretty standard at mo.

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal