AuthorTopic: Its not just the kids that are anti social!  (Read 662 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline joe90

  • Posts: 288
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Find me on twitter @joeohall
    • Loughborough
  • Referrals: 0
Its not just the kids that are anti social!
« on: November 05, 2007, 19:57:39 »
Last night at my parents, looked out the kitchen window to see just black smoke!!! upon further investigation found the guy who had bought the 200 year old farm cottage behind us.... only to apply to demolish it had lit a fire not 4 yards from our fence, the best part of 8ft high.

Upon aproaching him with may other disgruntled neighbours to ask if he would let it die down all we got was 'its under control' followed by him re-fusing to talk to us!

now i dont mind a fire on a winter night but the bloke failed to realise that the other side of our fence is a 1500L heating oil tank!

Maybe its because he recieved 21 complaints about his plans, as hes also just trimmed the hedge to the front of the property - leaving all the clippings on the pavement.

pretty pathetic behaviour from middle aged man! in what was a nice country village!
Joe O'Halloran
2007 Discovery 3 GS 2.7L V6
1979 Series 3 88" 2.25L  Rag Top ERC915T

Offline Lord Shagg-Pyle

  • Posts: 1519
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • "Where we're going, we don't need roads!"
  • Referrals: 0
Its not just the kids that are anti social!
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2007, 20:46:32 »
Can he demolish it? I thought that would probably be listed at that age. As for the fire aspect, if he continues speak to the local council re the nuisance aspect.
If you want to be really picky, he may have commited littering offences by dropping stuff, namely the clippings, from his land onto the pavement, but that would be pushing it. Worth a shot though.

Offline joe90

  • Posts: 288
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Find me on twitter @joeohall
    • Loughborough
  • Referrals: 0
Its not just the kids that are anti social!
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2007, 21:22:11 »
Apparently so. Even though Melton Council voted 100% against the development it was over turned by the chairman as it would cost too much to fight at apeal!

Just annoying that someone can be so petty!
Joe O'Halloran
2007 Discovery 3 GS 2.7L V6
1979 Series 3 88" 2.25L  Rag Top ERC915T

Offline ian_s

  • Posts: 969
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Its not just the kids that are anti social!
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2007, 22:20:10 »
that close to an oil tank, i would have called the fire brigade :?
series 3 - 200tdi
Discovery V8

Offline andyhubbard

  • Posts: 788
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Its not just the kids that are anti social!
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2007, 22:24:54 »
If it's 100% against then what's in it for the Chairman ?

Offline Wireless

  • Posts: 478
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Its not just the kids that are anti social!
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2007, 12:14:23 »
I thought that no-one could light a fire that causes black smoke, it's called environmental pollution.
AFAIK, this is enforced, even if it takes place in the countryside, report him to your local environmental health officer.

Offline Disco-Ron

  • Posts: 1048
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Its not just the kids that are anti social!
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2007, 18:06:06 »
Quote from: "ian_s"
that close to an oil tank, i would have called the fire brigade :?


Me too!!!!
gone from 200tdi.... to 300tdi... still with loads done to it, in fact, even more than the last truck...LOL!!!

Offline Skywalker

  • Posts: 357
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Its not just the kids that are anti social!
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2007, 19:39:22 »
Quote from: "joe90"
Apparently so. Even though Melton Council voted 100% against the development it was over turned by the chairman as it would cost too much to fight at apeal!


I always thought the chairman had the casting vote in the case of a tie  :?  .......... not the ability to over rule the entire council   :shock:

The smell of Grimsby docks springs to mind  :twisted:

Dave
WIP ........ just Keeps Changing .......

SW

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal