AuthorTopic: Which 4x4  (Read 675 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline blueboar

  • Posts: 238
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Which 4x4
« on: January 13, 2008, 18:06:50 »
My partners parents are thinking of getting a 4x4, out of the, Toyota Rav 4, Nissan Trail and the Honda CRV.

What are their pros and cons? and which are the best websites to find reviews??

many thanks


bb
Grant me the senility to forget the people I never liked anyway,
the good fortune to run into the ones I do,
and the eyesight to tell the difference.

series 3 88   x 2
series 3 109 x 2
series 3 stage 1 Carawagon
300tdi auto disco
td5 disco
series 2a 88
90 td
Mitsubushi Shogun Sport 2.5 TD Warrior

Offline Boggert

  • Posts: 1408
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2008, 18:15:59 »
The New x trail is great, much better than the old one. My brother-in-law has a Rav4 and I'm not impressed. Don't know much about the CRV.
If want to walk it walk it, if you want to ride it ride it just leave me alone to drive it!

"Save The Cheer leader, save the world"

Edge

  • Guest
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2008, 18:19:53 »
"What Car?" do reviews of most vehicles.

Silvery Thing

  • Guest
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2008, 18:22:29 »
My wife had the older model of X-trail and it was a really good car. The RAV is slightly expensive but then you do get good build quality with good reliability. I too don't know much about the CRV but would think it to be a decent car :-.

Offline TDi90

  • Posts: 2712
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Rolly - Under Construction...
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2008, 18:30:14 »
tell them they want a proper 4x4  :twisted:
maybe a merc unimog or something similar....  :P ;) :grin:
TDi90
~The DFYTR Moderation Team~


Offline muddymesser

  • Posts: 420
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2008, 18:34:59 »
if i remember rightly the new rav 4 is ment to be good and theres isnt that much diffrence that and the crv . . . i dont realy know much about the x trail

would a midget fall over doing the limbo???

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2008, 18:36:29 »
tell them they want a proper 4x4  :twisted:
maybe a merc unimog or something similar....  :P ;) :grin:

I have to agree, I just can't see the point in "lifestyle" 4x4.  Whilst they attract plenty of bad publicity for the 4x4 cause they can't justify their existance by being proper 4x4, they are nothing like as good off-road (partly due to the tyres I guess) and many of them are lousy tow-cars too.  So you end up with a big car with all the pitfalls of a 4x4 and little of the benifits.
Oh, and depreciation is bad on them too, which kind of bears out that I'm not the only one who isn't keen on them.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

Offline davidlandy

  • Posts: 3568
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2008, 19:11:25 »
good point RRB - the dep'n would be a nightmare, and also if its a company car the tax is sky high on the 'chelsea tractor' types cos of the high price and co2 outputs.

given the choice for a roadcar I would rather have a decent estate car.

Dave
Sniff, sniff, this mud smells funny

Offline Tommo

  • Posts: 990
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2008, 20:28:37 »
cant beat an impreza estate for rough tracks and snow and all round practicality.
Land Rover Tourettes Crew

www.sniff-my-diff.com

Offline Disco Matt

  • Posts: 2666
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2008, 20:52:10 »
What about the Subaru Forester? Seems to be reliable and popular, bit thirsty though!
1996 Discovery 300TDI. She's got it where it counts...

Offline Tommo

  • Posts: 990
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2008, 20:56:41 »
not as much fun as the impreza though.
Land Rover Tourettes Crew

www.sniff-my-diff.com

Offline Disco Matt

  • Posts: 2666
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #11 on: January 13, 2008, 21:20:47 »
not as much fun as the impreza though.

Well, it is the same chassis, and in terms of giving the local Saxo brigade a nasty shock it's probably even better! :cool:
1996 Discovery 300TDI. She's got it where it counts...

Offline carbore

  • Posts: 1082
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Which 4x4
« Reply #12 on: January 13, 2008, 21:51:09 »
I agree that unless you need some 4x4 then all softroaders will cost money in petrol and depreciation and compromise you as opposed to an estate. 

Re  the Subaru stuff if often driven by people who NEED a 4x4 but DONT  really want one (vets and country doctors etc) but they are not very economical esp the fast ones.

I do have a strange soft sport for the Dihatsu terrios mind you!
CORNISH SPRINT AND HILLCLIMB CHAMPION 2009

Lotus Elise (Tuned/lightened for sprint racing Championship winner 2009)
Freelander 1 TD4 Auto AKA the Big Black Bus (Brownchurch Roof Rack, Hatch Bag rear liner)
Ferguson T20 "Grey Fergie" TVO Tractor 1951

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal