Forum back online. Please post!
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Not saying military resources are stretched, but bringing back a Vulcan is taking the mick! :roll:It's a completed waste of money, the £7,000,000 could have been better spent.
We have to remember that this machine is an icon of times that we are best rid of. But I will still be in awe watching it fly.
Quote from: littlepow on April 16, 2008, 15:01:07Not saying military resources are stretched, but bringing back a Vulcan is taking the mick! :roll:It's a completed waste of money, the £7,000,000 could have been better spent. The money to restore the Vulcan Bomber - something that we should be proud of as part of our military heritage - has come from the public. Less than half has come from the Lottery heritage fund.What would you have spent the money on? I would rather see £2.3 million of Lottery money spent on something British than go to some Muslim group to build a mosque. (Isn't there a sense of irony in the fact that Muslims abhor gambling yet they still like to profit from the lottery).Over to you
I stand to be corrected on this, but isn't the Vulcan to the Sky organisation a charity, with money donated by members of the Public and businesses? From what I recall, the MoD had nothing to do with at all.
Just been on the local news here it didn't gain certification today. They have a recurring problem with the landing gear doors. So its back in for modifications. More than 75% of the funds for the Vulcan have been public donations so I think that answers the question that people think its money well spent.It may be an icon of times we'd rather forget but surely the same can be said about WW1 & 2 aircraft. I live fairly near to bruntingthorpe if I am about and free when I know its going up I'll go and take some pics
Quote from: freelanderpx54 on April 16, 2008, 15:53:54Quote from: littlepow on April 16, 2008, 15:01:07Not saying military resources are stretched, but bringing back a Vulcan is taking the mick! :roll:It's a completed waste of money, the £7,000,000 could have been better spent. The money to restore the Vulcan Bomber - something that we should be proud of as part of our military heritage - has come from the public. Less than half has come from the Lottery heritage fund.What would you have spent the money on? I would rather see £2.3 million of Lottery money spent on something British than go to some Muslim group to build a mosque. (Isn't there a sense of irony in the fact that Muslims abhor gambling yet they still like to profit from the lottery).Over to youHow about medical care for injured soldiers, food for the homeless or charities that are desperatley underfunded? Instead of some cold war relic.Quote from: Lord Shagg-Pyle on April 16, 2008, 18:05:54I stand to be corrected on this, but isn't the Vulcan to the Sky organisation a charity, with money donated by members of the Public and businesses? From what I recall, the MoD had nothing to do with at all.Never said it did. MoD could afford to waste that much money, there streched to breaking point as it is.Sorry to rant, but the way this country wastes money is appaling. It then has the audacity to complain about needing to raise even more for the basics it has promised the people that live within its care.
the vulcan is a stunning aircraft, it carried out the longest bombing mission of all time when it dropped a bomb on port stanley in the falklands war, long may it fly :clap:
Sorry to rant, but the way this country wastes money is appaling. It then has the audacity to complain about needing to raise even more for the basics it has promised the people that live within its care.
Quote from: littlepow on April 16, 2008, 15:01:07Not saying military resources are stretched, but bringing back a Vulcan is taking the mick! :roll:It's a completed waste of money, the £7,000,000 could have been better spent.This bomber has been restored with money from private donations, a little hard won lottery cash, and thousands of hours of voluntary work by ex-Vulcan engineers some of whom I used to work with.More info here: http://www.tvoc.co.uk/This has very little to with the current military budget.