AuthorTopic: Multi User Paths  (Read 508 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ne jones

  • Posts: 464
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Multi User Paths
« on: October 08, 2008, 19:14:00 »
Copied and pasted from another forum;

You may hear a lot more about these in the news and in time it's quite likely we will see them in the countryside.

There is a move amongst councils and consultants to combine bridleways, cycle tracks and footpaths into a 'multi user path' that is safe for all non-motorised users with a view to maintaining a network that gives best value.

There are no plans to include vehicles and the information I have seen in no way suggests this will impact us at all although if apparently safer routes are available we may see less other traffic using BOATs.

We cannot drive them and they should not affect the network we can presently drive.

This is up for discussion at Local Access Forum Level in January and I will keep you all informed of developments.
Cheers, Nathan.


Offline EbonynIvory

  • Posts: 189
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Multi User Paths
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2008, 22:34:26 »
There is a move amongst councils and consultants to combine bridleways, cycle tracks and footpaths into a 'multi user path' that is safe for all non-motorised users with a view to maintaining a network that gives best value.


Well, this would be good for the cyclists and horse riders as bridleways are often only accessable by riding down a main road like the A46!

littlepow

  • Guest
Re: Multi User Paths
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2008, 10:39:28 »
I hope it goes ahead, will open up more countryside access to more people.  Anything that promotes exercise and sport without removing access for others (upsetting RA is an added bonus!) can only be seen as a good thing.

Offline paul_humphreys

  • Posts: 2181
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Multi User Paths
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2008, 11:43:30 »
Yes its a good plan, so it will never work :shock:.

Paul
LC 80 series 1993. 285/75/16s Cooper STTs, OME 850s on the front with 25mm packer, 868s on the rear. 4.88 diffs. Winch bumper with 12000lb winch. Factory lockers. HD rear bumper with wheel carrier and winch mount.

http://www.crag-uk.org


Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15221
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Multi User Paths
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2008, 19:09:12 »
All footpaths should be declared cycle paths with any over 1.2 m wide being bridle paths.

It should also be legal (if not preferable) to take those skewers away from ramblers at every opportunity, they are damned dangerous with the things.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal