AuthorTopic: 10.5 Seconds  (Read 1075 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bush Tucker Man

  • Posts: 9161
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
10.5 Seconds
« on: January 22, 2009, 13:39:53 »
I've just been having a bit of a 'sort out' in my snug.

During this (enforced) activity, I found some early copies of 'One Life', one had an article about the development of the L322 Range Rover.


The titular time was mentioned as the elapsed time for the Range Rover on the (13 mile/240 corner) Nurburgring.
It didn't mention whether it was a very early prototype of the Supercharged version, so it must have been the standard B*W 4.4 V8?


Still, that's a blisteringly fast time for something like the Rangie 8-[ :clap:

In comparison, it took Clarkson 9:59 to get a Jaguar S-Type (twin-turbo diesel) around the track

Once more, Wikipedia comes up trumps again, with a list of times

As you can see a (highly) modified B*W X5 did it in 7:50 (700BHP V12)


Hats off, & a truss to cope with the size of his 'Cajones' for that RR test-driver
Richard A Thackeray 
Defender 110Td5 'Heritage Gone, but not forgotten
Jaguar XKR; X88 JLT, also 'gone, but not forgotten'

Yorkshire Born & Bred, and proud of it.

"You Can Allus Tell A Yorkshireman, But You Can't tell Him Owt!"

Offline hairyasswelder

  • Posts: 1351
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • It's gonna cost ya
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 10.5 Seconds
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2009, 15:07:26 »

In comparison, it took Clarkson 9:59 to get a Jaguar S-Type (twin-turbo diesel) around the track


To be fair Sabine did beat old pube heads time in a Tranny van  :shock: :shock:  :lol: :lol: so I think the jag has a bit more steam  ;)

Still pretty impressive for 2 1/2 tonne of Green oval  :clap: :clap: :clap:

'88 RR 3.5 efi, an on going project :o) evolving daily/slowly

Offline Disco Matt

  • Posts: 2666
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 10.5 Seconds
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2009, 16:29:31 »
My plan for the funniest TG episode ever:

Build "sleeper" Disco 1 with 500bhp engine

Hand keys to Sabine

Put Clarkson in passenger seat

Enjoy watching him being absolutely petrified for about ten minutes  :lol:
1996 Discovery 300TDI. She's got it where it counts...

Offline Yoshi

  • Posts: 2215
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 10.5 Seconds
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2009, 16:42:28 »

In comparison, it took Clarkson 9:59 to get a Jaguar S-Type (twin-turbo diesel) around the track


To be fair Sabine did beat old pube heads time in a Tranny van  :shock: :shock:  :lol: :lol: so I think the jag has a bit more steam  ;)

Still pretty impressive for 2 1/2 tonne of Green oval  :clap: :clap: :clap:



She never actually beat him in the transit, she was about 30 second off IIRC.


1995 Discovery XS 300TDi 4" lift and ready to go!

There is no devil, theres only god when he's drunk - Tom Waits.

Offline thermidorthelobster

  • Posts: 3557
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 10.5 Seconds
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2009, 18:47:33 »
I presume 10.5 minutes, rather than seconds?

BTM, off topic but do you have XK8/XKR times for the Nurburgring? :)
David French
Tree-hugging communist
1999 Discovery II TD5 Manual
Patriot roof rack, QT Services diff guards front & rear, DiscoParts steering guard[/url], Autologic ECU upgrade, 2" Old Man Emu lift, 235/85R16 BF Goodrich All Terrains, Safari snorkel, DiscoParts jackable sills, Warn Tabor 9000

Ex Disco 200TDI, P38a 4.6HSE and 101FC 6x6 Camper.  Africa Trip Blog

Offline v8kenny

  • Posts: 694
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 10.5 Seconds
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2009, 19:04:19 »
Wow, if he meant 10.5 seconds that's an average speed round the ring of 4422.85 mph !  :lol:
The nice part of living in a small town is that when I don't know what I am doing, someone else does

Offline hairyasswelder

  • Posts: 1351
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • It's gonna cost ya
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 10.5 Seconds
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2009, 19:11:34 »

She never actually beat him in the transit, she was about 30 second off IIRC.

Ok  I  meet you 1/2 way  :lol: :lol:
She beat his Jag time in the jag and missed with the transit by 7 secs
Transit van was 10 minutes and 8 seconds
Been googling  ;)
'88 RR 3.5 efi, an on going project :o) evolving daily/slowly

Offline Bush Tucker Man

  • Posts: 9161
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 10.5 Seconds
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2009, 21:53:33 »
I presume 10.5 minutes, rather than seconds?

BTM, off topic but do you have XK8/XKR times for the Nurburgring? :)

Yes, minutes.

Sorry, not to hand, but I have seen them somewhere :-k :-k :-k

Not sure if they're for a 'Series 1' (either 4.0, or 4.2), or a 'Series 2' (facelifted/revamped model)

I'll search for them, they might be in one of my 'Brookland Books'??

Edit;
There's a XKR listed at 8:25 on the Wikipedia link (but no year given)
« Last Edit: January 22, 2009, 21:55:18 by Bush Tucker Man »
Richard A Thackeray 
Defender 110Td5 'Heritage Gone, but not forgotten
Jaguar XKR; X88 JLT, also 'gone, but not forgotten'

Yorkshire Born & Bred, and proud of it.

"You Can Allus Tell A Yorkshireman, But You Can't tell Him Owt!"

Offline wormster

  • Posts: 1450
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 10.5 Seconds
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2009, 23:52:28 »
OH HECK!!

just to get anyfing with 4 wheels in the 10 min + bracket round there is good going in my book.
Mainly found lurking underground and drivin my vit off road

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal