AuthorTopic: Trailing Arms Question  (Read 1592 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lewis.J.P_1987

  • Posts: 129
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • "Roads?....where we're going, we don't need roads.
  • Referrals: 0
Trailing Arms Question
« on: August 07, 2009, 13:31:27 »
Does any one know the thread type for the rear lower trailing arms for a Ranger Rover Classic. I thinks its M20 X 1.5?


[img width= height=]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5xhMRptpho[/img]   http://www.youtube.com/user/LewisJP1987

Offline V8MoneyPit

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 5077
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Trailing Arms Question
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2009, 14:42:44 »
Just measured mine and it seems to be M20. Standard M20 pitch is 2.5. My aftermarket arms are this. Metric fine would be 1.5 like you suggest.
Rgds
Steve

"Reality is wrong. Dreams are for real."

Land Rover build:
www.daisythediesel.com

Photos (my other passion and weakness):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/v8moneypit/

Offline Rossko

  • Posts: 297
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Trailing Arms Question
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2009, 10:30:15 »
Most likely 'it depends' - imperial up to some cut off date, metric thereafter?  Around 1989 at a guess.
GLASS

Offline Lewis.J.P_1987

  • Posts: 129
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • "Roads?....where we're going, we don't need roads.
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Trailing Arms Question
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2009, 10:58:15 »
Well mines 1987, but the trailing arms have been changed a few times, what would the original thread be for that year?
[img width= height=]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5xhMRptpho[/img]   http://www.youtube.com/user/LewisJP1987

Offline squaddie_fox

  • Posts: 386
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Trailing Arms Question
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2009, 21:48:47 »
you want the trailing arms with the larger thread. as the ones with the thin thread have a tendency to either strip the thread or bend easily when you are of roading.

235/85 special tracks, 3.9 V8, HD bumpers, +3 inch lift, +5 shocks f&r, 12000lbs champion winch, heavy duty steering bars, CB and a snorkel....

Offline clbarclay

  • Posts: 1615
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Trailing Arms Question
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2009, 21:33:48 »
The threads on my trailing arms (from 1986/7 range rovers) are M20x2.5 course thread.
Chris

Various range rovers from 1986 to 1988 in various states
Locost sports car based on mk2 escort - currently working on brakes, fuel and wiring

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Trailing Arms Question
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2009, 03:41:35 »
Basically a Carb'ed RRC would be imperial and the thread is much tinnner but it's also a finer thread so as said is gets damaged, especially once it's rusted too.

Later (EFI onwards) should be M20 the same as the front radius arms which changed at the same time (thicker axle bushes etc).

The axle to trailing lnk bush remained the same AFAIK, along with the A frame and Panhard rod.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal