Mud-club

Chat & Social => The Bar - General Chat => Topic started by: paul_humphreys on November 12, 2006, 12:52:55

Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: paul_humphreys on November 12, 2006, 12:52:55: Please see this campaign and oppose it if you think that it's the right thing to do.

Circulate to other users.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/actionnetwork/G1604

Paul
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: UDTrev on November 12, 2006, 13:08:53: Added my opposition

Trev
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: DarrenG on November 12, 2006, 13:33:35: Me too. Have also posted on the DOC site.
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: paul_humphreys on November 12, 2006, 13:42:25: Everyone need to fight things like this. I have posted it on about 10 forums :D .

Paul
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: gtomo2 on November 12, 2006, 13:53:48: done it as well. but think the wording when you have voted could be better :wink:
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: jjsaul on November 12, 2006, 14:18:45: Quote
To keep Byways (open to all Traffic - BOATs) for use by walkers, horse riders and essential farm traffic ONLY. These are not the place for high powered mechanised vehicles. This effects Byways throughout the entire British Isles. Your quiet walk in the countryside could be endangered by a driver of a 4x4 intent on putting his/her car through its paces.

Not biased at all of course!!!!
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: Evilgoat on November 12, 2006, 15:33:49: Done and popped it on roadcrew (well going to)
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: Mudlark on November 12, 2006, 15:45:50: Sorry didn't realise what this post was when I posted mine
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: sleeplessparadise on November 12, 2006, 17:22:12: Have opposed and will now go post it on the other sites I use :x
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: RCRockCrawler on November 12, 2006, 17:29:53: 1 supporter, 65 opposers :lol: :lol:
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: landraver on November 12, 2006, 18:10:39: Done!

Jeff
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: Colin 009 on November 12, 2006, 18:27:32: Have voted and left a comment.
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: landraver on November 12, 2006, 18:28:14: Quote from: "RCRockCrawler"
1 supporter, 65 opposers :lol: :lol:

75 : 1 now :D
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: JD LWB on November 12, 2006, 19:19:22: 83:1 now :D
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: Boggert on November 12, 2006, 19:24:33: Its still only got 1 supporter...LOL :lol:
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: MrTFWitt on November 12, 2006, 19:29:07: Careful there, you'll be creating an oppressed minority at this rate.

:D
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: skip on November 12, 2006, 19:54:16: Now currently 1 for 95 against.
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: BrumLee on November 12, 2006, 22:28:47: I think I went OTT with my comment (http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/actionnetwork/A17311484) :twisted:
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: Boggert on November 12, 2006, 22:37:29: Quote from: "BrumLee"
I think I went OTT with my comment (http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/actionnetwork/A17311484) :twisted:

He he he MINT! Good comment :lol:

Im all for "responsible use of the Byways" just because I drive a 4x4 on it does not mean I am being Ã¢â‚¬Å“irresponsible.Ã¢â‚¬Â
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: Range Rover Blues on November 13, 2006, 01:55:57: No, sorry lost my patience trying to register as a user. Not sure htey need all that information just to allow me to vote and I don't want everybody being avbvle to see my full name thanks, especially when you are opposed to anti's who use underhand practices.
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: mike142sl on November 13, 2006, 09:39:33: 147 to 1 now
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: Boggert on November 13, 2006, 10:18:55: It seems some of their campaign is based around "The dangers" of 4x4's
My brother is a 4x4 enthusiast as well a enjoying walking! strange mix hey, but not so, I like my walking as well as driving a Green lane, or getting muddy in a quarry.
However it was walking that put him in hospital when he broke his leg! not while driving a green lane.

Sorry their logic is lost..............
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: paul_humphreys on November 13, 2006, 11:29:47: 160 to 4, but its been "Hidden pending moderation". If you read the ones who have voted in support then you will see thay 2 of the supporters are actually opposed to it. So its 162 to 2 :D .

Some of you may not know this but CRAG`s membership officer is a walker :D .

Paul
Title: Oppose this Campaign
Post by: BrumLee on November 13, 2006, 14:52:28: Quote from: "paul_humphreys"
160 to 4, but its been "Hidden pending moderation". If you read the ones who have voted in support then you will see thay 2 of the supporters are actually opposed to it. So its 162 to 2 :D .

Paul

Yep, one said he'd voted in sympathy as there was only one vote for :twisted: :lol:

Also I emailed the moderators saying the campaign had broken their ruling i.e the campaign is objectionable (Arousing disapproval; offensive) and based on assumptions rather than facts. They emailed me back at 23:21 saying their house rules were not breached but I also noticed it was "Hidden pending moderation" :wink: :lol: