Mud-club

Chat & Social => The Bar - General Chat => Topic started by: JD LWB on March 22, 2007, 20:18:08

Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: JD LWB on March 22, 2007, 20:18:08
here (http://www.topgear.com/content/features/stories/2007/03/stories/16/1.html)

I think he's right.
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: Lord Shagg-Pyle on March 22, 2007, 20:26:26
I totally agree with what he is saying. Saying that, I've seen a lot of Pinzgaeurs (think that the right spelling) in British army use at the moment. They are quite good apparently
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: Xtremeteam on March 22, 2007, 20:30:03
awww yeh

thats soooo true

& cournel dick is on BBc2 right now
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: Range Rover Blues on March 23, 2007, 03:42:09
Pinzgauer is made in Britain isn't it?

BTW, the yanks laugh so hard at Land Rover Defenders that they bought loads of them.

They survived in Northern Ireland for years.

And the reason they don'r fit 3.9s is that Petrol is a bl***y silly idea in a fighting vehicle.  The TDi Wolfs are quite quick though I'm told.
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: Boggert on March 23, 2007, 09:06:43
Spot on I think
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: greasemonkey on March 23, 2007, 10:10:48
HI
the thing is if you stick a driver / commander /and four squaddies in a lwb wolf
with all the kit and kevalar
it is to heavy to be a speed machine
we had stripped out SWB V8's in Ireland
only four of us to a vehicle and they were still slow
ok once they were moving though
its the armour that weighs things down
but better to have than not i always say
best thing was all the spares were same day delivery
cheers
GM
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: narked on March 23, 2007, 10:22:03
Surely Humvees aren't exactly racecar-quick?
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: greasemonkey on March 23, 2007, 10:34:55
HI
no humvees are quick but
are arse to work on and too small inside
all engine and sharp corners
only good for four guys with no kit
they were designed for recce's only
get in and out as fast as possible
good on road pants off road
and use fuel like 4 mpg
GM
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: steve howes on March 23, 2007, 10:48:48
hi greasemonkey when where you in ireland , did a couple of tours there myself!  always liked the old pig better
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: narked on March 23, 2007, 11:05:16
Quote from: "greasemonkey"

good on road pants off road
and use fuel like 4 mpg
GM


There we are then, by the time they've slowed down to do the off roady bits and stopped for several fill ups, the Landy would have passed 'em ;)

Turtle and the hare! :P
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: per_ardua on March 23, 2007, 15:12:37
The snatches weren't really designed for what they are being used for now in Iraq, they were designed for patrol in Northern Ireland, on road. with off road capability.

Wolves are very fast , hence many written off in RTC's
They are being replaced by Panther because they are an armoured vehicle against road side bombs, usually modified artillery rounds etc.

Snatches are good at the job designed for , Iraq is not that.

There are plenty of servicemen/women retired and serving  on this forum who have used all the vehicles in anger around the world.

Possible even a Fiat Uno  :D
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: greasemonkey on March 23, 2007, 15:28:10
Hi
i totally agree
the thing with the British forces is they are
forced to us what ever they are given
in the Falklands we used the Argie merc 4x4
because they were nicer than the SIII we had
in Iraq we used shoguns and pajero's
again because of the aircon etc
but the vehicles must be squaddie proof
and the LR are this
well almost
like you say the wolf was too quick and numerous rollovers
occured
i was in Ireland in '86 and '88 Long kesh guard and lisbon shield
cheers
GM
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: discojames on March 24, 2007, 00:20:38
Quote from: "Range Rover Blues"
Pinzgauer is made in Britain isn't it?



Yes they are, they are made in Guildford!

(I've had to recover one of their demonstrators when it gave up on the M3, on it's way to fix a broken down one on Salisbury Plain!!)

James
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: AbyssDJ on March 24, 2007, 00:46:44
its all true really - the land rovers will get our troops to the place they need to go without fail, but they NEED to be faster.

they really should fit bigger engines in them
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: JimsMowing on March 24, 2007, 19:03:18
Quote from: "greasemonkey"
HI
no humvees are quick but
are arse to work on and too small inside
all engine and sharp corners
only good for four guys with no kit
they were designed for recce's only
get in and out as fast as possible
good on road pants off road
and use fuel like 4 mpg
GM


Put the Humvee engine in the Defender, and kit it out with a wider track. Or maybe a nice 6.3 V8 Diesel!  :D
Title: Clarkson's view on British Military 4X4's
Post by: tarcus on May 11, 2007, 16:08:24
Quote from: "discojames"
Quote from: "Range Rover Blues"
Pinzgauer is made in Britain isn't it?



Yes they are, they are made in Guildford!


The British army started using the generation 2 machines (diesel engines, disc brakes, power steering, 2.5 tonne payload on the 6x6), and as soon as they got the initial teething troubles sorted out, flogged the company to the yanks!!  They're now owned by Stewart and Stevenson, an american company..
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal