Fun, Friendly and Free
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Forum back online. Please post!
Home
Forum
Battle
Search
Login
Register
Mud-club
»
Vehicle & Technical
»
Series Land Rovers
(Moderator:
Frankie-Boy
) »
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter (Read 1922 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Spyderman
Posts: 146
Attack: 100
Defense: 100
Attack Member
Karma: +0/-0
Referrals: 0
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
«
on:
October 28, 2006, 13:37:12 »
I have a 1981 Series III Diesel. What are the pros & cons of replacing the oil bath air filter with a K 7 N. I have been told elsewhere that the engine will be smokier with the K & N. The engine smokes like a train already, don't want to make it worse as MOT coming up. What do you think?[/b]
Logged
Who needs brakes???
1981 Series III 88"
2.5 N/A Diesel
9.00x16 Michelin XL
Fairey PTO Winch
1 ton Shackles
Blue/Cream with a delicate shade of mud.
hobbit
Posts: 4750
Attack: 100
Defense: 100
Attack Member
Karma: +0/-0
Referrals: 0
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
«
Reply #1 on:
October 28, 2006, 14:12:27 »
Try running with the oil bath out and see how much less smokey it will be one day, that'll give you some idea
Logged
Kev
'91 stretch Discovery 200 Tdi
Hybrid for running round (got to go now)
Srs 3 Lightweight petrol (got to go)
Srs 3 Lightweight petrol, runabout
Not every problem can be solved with duct tape, and it's exactly for those situations we have WD 40
Spyderman
Posts: 146
Attack: 100
Defense: 100
Attack Member
Karma: +0/-0
Referrals: 0
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
«
Reply #2 on:
October 28, 2006, 16:11:36 »
Won't that risk sucking dirt into the engine?
Logged
Who needs brakes???
1981 Series III 88"
2.5 N/A Diesel
9.00x16 Michelin XL
Fairey PTO Winch
1 ton Shackles
Blue/Cream with a delicate shade of mud.
hobbit
Posts: 4750
Attack: 100
Defense: 100
Attack Member
Karma: +0/-0
Referrals: 0
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
«
Reply #3 on:
October 28, 2006, 16:25:41 »
Only briefly on a tarmac road, long term it would, you could warm her up, then take the pipe off the intake, and see how it looks in the tail pipe when running down the road
Logged
Kev
'91 stretch Discovery 200 Tdi
Hybrid for running round (got to go now)
Srs 3 Lightweight petrol (got to go)
Srs 3 Lightweight petrol, runabout
Not every problem can be solved with duct tape, and it's exactly for those situations we have WD 40
Spyderman
Posts: 146
Attack: 100
Defense: 100
Attack Member
Karma: +0/-0
Referrals: 0
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
«
Reply #4 on:
October 28, 2006, 17:53:24 »
Ok, will try that thanks, Have you used a K&N filter?
Logged
Who needs brakes???
1981 Series III 88"
2.5 N/A Diesel
9.00x16 Michelin XL
Fairey PTO Winch
1 ton Shackles
Blue/Cream with a delicate shade of mud.
tomarse
Posts: 260
Attack: 100
Defense: 100
Attack Member
Karma: +0/-0
Referrals: 0
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
«
Reply #5 on:
October 28, 2006, 18:18:20 »
ive got a k&n on my 2.5 n/a D 2Aand it works fine and doesnt smoke.
it means i have less stuff getting in the way in my engine bay ;)
the landy definately goes better on the rare occasions that i clean and re-oil the k&n, so it probably gives more go than the normal filter.
Logged
Spyderman
Posts: 146
Attack: 100
Defense: 100
Attack Member
Karma: +0/-0
Referrals: 0
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
«
Reply #6 on:
October 28, 2006, 18:22:15 »
The main reason I was thinking of doing it was to free up some space in the engine bay and hopefully a bit more BHP but obviously not at the expense of not passing the dreaded MOT
Logged
Who needs brakes???
1981 Series III 88"
2.5 N/A Diesel
9.00x16 Michelin XL
Fairey PTO Winch
1 ton Shackles
Blue/Cream with a delicate shade of mud.
tinca
Posts: 58
Attack: 100
Defense: 100
Attack Member
Karma: +0/-0
Referrals: 0
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
«
Reply #7 on:
October 28, 2006, 20:01:01 »
surely it would run leaner with the k&n on it, more air flow and all that, so i would imagine it will run with less smoke, not more
Logged
Robbo
Posts: 252
Attack: 100
Defense: 100
Attack Member
Karma: +0/-0
Referrals: 0
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
«
Reply #8 on:
October 29, 2006, 00:30:37 »
don't forget to warm up the engine loads and loads and loads and loads and loads and loads...getting the picture yet? loads and loads and loads before the MOT - it helps with the emissions if the engine is really hot when tested.
Cheers
Robbo
Logged
Daisy SWB series 3 station wagon, 1975 and pretty in mud
Eat a live toad the first thing in the morning and nothing worse will happen to you the rest of the day
Spyderman
Posts: 146
Attack: 100
Defense: 100
Attack Member
Karma: +0/-0
Referrals: 0
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
«
Reply #9 on:
October 29, 2006, 09:05:41 »
That'll be LOADS then. Thanks. I've heard that if you run the tank right down and put a small amount of 50/50 mix of Diesel/Parafin with a bottle of Cetane booster just before you take it to the MOT that does the trick. Might give that a practice go first.
Logged
Who needs brakes???
1981 Series III 88"
2.5 N/A Diesel
9.00x16 Michelin XL
Fairey PTO Winch
1 ton Shackles
Blue/Cream with a delicate shade of mud.
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Mud-club
»
Vehicle & Technical
»
Series Land Rovers
(Moderator:
Frankie-Boy
) »
Oil Bath vs. K & N Filter
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal