AuthorTopic: I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!  (Read 1469 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline auf_wiedersehen_pet

  • Posts: 1179
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComp springs.

My old RRC V8 was fitted with HD +2" ProComps. I broke it earlier this year and kept the ProComps with the intention of fitting them on my 300TDi Disco. I've just had them powder coated in orange (can't think why) and now I can't remember which are the fronts and which are the backs.

One pair is taller than the others!!

Anybody got any ProComps? Anybody about to fit any ProComps?

Any help would be gratefully accepted.
Rob Steele

1995 Land Rover Discovery 300 TDi - Everyday Car (Ex Jap)
2007 Toyota Avensis 2.2 T-180 - Sensible Car (Ex TSB Bank)

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2007, 15:51:08 »
Generally the front are shorter then the back, but with HD ones it's not as obvious.

HOWEVER, if they came from a V8 and you fit them to a TDI then they might sag a bit too much.

I think mine are pro-comp so I can go outside once it's stopped raining and count the coild for you.

But I'd guess the back ones have thicker steel in them.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

Offline auf_wiedersehen_pet

  • Posts: 1179
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2007, 16:00:39 »
Hi RRB

Many thanks for the quick reply.

Quote from: "Range Rover Blues"
Generally the front are shorter then the back, but with HD ones it's not as obvious.


Just my luck to make life more complicated.

Quote from: "Range Rover Blues"
HOWEVER, if they came from a V8 and you fit them to a TDI then they might sag a bit too much.


I'm hoping not. When I originally purchased them, I asked for HD as I had a bonnet mounted spare and a plated bonnet.

Quote from: "Range Rover Blues"
I think mine are pro-comp so I can go outside once it's stopped raining and count the coild for you.


If you could, I'd really appreciate it - If the rain is anything like it is down here, that might be some time.

Quote from: "Range Rover Blues"
But I'd guess the back ones have thicker steel in them.


I think they are the same - probably because of HD - I'll check though.

Again, many thanks.
Rob Steele

1995 Land Rover Discovery 300 TDi - Everyday Car (Ex Jap)
2007 Toyota Avensis 2.2 T-180 - Sensible Car (Ex TSB Bank)

Offline clbarclay

  • Posts: 1615
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2007, 18:45:26 »
Just to make life even more awkward, but I'm sure I've heard that procomp springs where handed left and right on at least one axle.
Chris

Various range rovers from 1986 to 1988 in various states
Locost sports car based on mk2 escort - currently working on brakes, fuel and wiring

Offline simon15

  • Posts: 496
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2007, 19:21:18 »
if i remember correctly when i done dad 2" lift the front springs were smaller in diameter than the rears.
Project "BLACK TIGER" underway :)
Disco 200TDi
Want lots of offroad prep parts give me a shout :)

Offline Ja1983

  • Posts: 1082
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • This week I have mostly been fixing....
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2007, 19:30:30 »
is it worth tring to contact pro-comp?

It has been said that, given enough time, a million monkeys bashing at a million typewriters would eventually produce the complete works of Shakespeare. Thanks to the Saxo forums, we now know this to be wrong

No oil leek = No oil left!

Offline auf_wiedersehen_pet

  • Posts: 1179
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2007, 20:14:38 »
Quote from: "clbarclay"
Just to make life even more awkward, but I'm sure I've heard that procomp springs where handed left and right on at least one axle.


OMG. Now they are coated there are no markings whatsoever!!

Quote from: "simon15"
if i remember correctly when i done dad 2" lift the front springs were smaller in diameter than the rears.


When you say smaller in diameter, do you mean the diameter of the spring coil?

When I fitted them, they are both the same overall diameter as they both seated on the base plate in the same way.

Quote from: "Ja1983"
is it worth tring to contact pro-comp?


I think it is!!!
Rob Steele

1995 Land Rover Discovery 300 TDi - Everyday Car (Ex Jap)
2007 Toyota Avensis 2.2 T-180 - Sensible Car (Ex TSB Bank)

Offline Tony F

  • Posts: 85
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!
« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2007, 18:17:50 »
Front springs are shorter than rear ones.

I just popped outside with my tape measure and my 2"+ scorpion springs measure 14" top to bottom on the rear and 11.5" on the front (this is on the vehicle so is compressed)
Tony Ferrari

GLASS Press Officer & Hertfordshire/Bedfordshire Rep.


2007 Land Rover 90

www.hertfordshire4x4response.net
www.madcowracing.org.uk

Offline BigA

  • Posts: 597
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2007, 19:09:01 »
recently fitted new springs to my 300, and the rears were noticeably longer than the front.
1978 Series III 88"


Offline auf_wiedersehen_pet

  • Posts: 1179
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!
« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2007, 19:37:56 »
Evening All,

Many many thanks to all of you who have answered this post or scrabbled around under the car with tape measures.

Do you ever get the feeling I should have posted this BEFORE I fitted my springs back to front.

AAAAAAAAAAGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

Take a look at the photo. (Tyres are BFG 235/85s by the way).

http://members.mud-club.com/profiles/auf_wiedersehen_pet/gallery/BFG/0/2ae8e9217632142e9d69dbc48bd49a2d.jpg/

Front looks very good - it should do with a set of rear springs in. Tyres never touch.

Back looks okay, very slightly lower than the front - to get this height took a set of 2" spacers too. Tyres sometimes clip the rear. Without the spacers, the back looked like I'd filled the boot with the lead off the church roof.

Oh hum. Another job for the list.

IF IN DOUBT, ASK MUD CLUB FIRST!!
Rob Steele

1995 Land Rover Discovery 300 TDi - Everyday Car (Ex Jap)
2007 Toyota Avensis 2.2 T-180 - Sensible Car (Ex TSB Bank)

Offline clbarclay

  • Posts: 1615
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!
« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2007, 19:51:34 »
Quote from: "Tony F"
Front springs are shorter than rear ones.

I just popped outside with my tape measure and my 2"+ scorpion springs measure 14" top to bottom on the rear and 11.5" on the front (this is on the vehicle so is compressed)


 :?

The trouble is the springs avalible for landrovers can vary quite a lot in terms of spring rate and free length, the 2 main measurements for springs. As i understand it scorpion springs come in a wide range of free legths and rates so may not be compareanble to the particulare procomp springs that rob has.


Unfortunately your a long way away and I won't be at college for a while (like 14 months) so this isn't the most practical of solutions, but there is a press at college that can be used to measure the characteristics of springs. If you can get the spring data from the manufacture you could then test all your springs on a similar machine to identify them by spring rate and free length.

I take it none of your springs are progressive (have varying coil spacing) to help identify them by?
Chris

Various range rovers from 1986 to 1988 in various states
Locost sports car based on mk2 escort - currently working on brakes, fuel and wiring

Offline Tony F

  • Posts: 85
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
I've got a really daft question about HD +2" ProComps!!
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2007, 20:45:33 »
Quite true Chris, Unlike some after market springs that are only handed on the front, Scorpion Racing supply handed rear ones too. On standard springs my Disco sagged to the offside by 2" at the rear, on the new ones it sits perfectly level (they are also uprated by 20%).

Aparently many suppliers give you the same springs as a Range Rover Classics which are not handed at the rear. It was only after I realised the problems I was having, that I noticed a great many Discos lean to the right when viewed from behind.
Tony Ferrari

GLASS Press Officer & Hertfordshire/Bedfordshire Rep.


2007 Land Rover 90

www.hertfordshire4x4response.net
www.madcowracing.org.uk

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal